User talk:LoveCP

From The Uncensored Hidden Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks for your contributions to these pages, I will recommend you as a promoted editor. ANONYMOUSX (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Just would like to make sure we can put as much accurate info on here as possible. I will probably be doing more edits very soon! LoveCP (talk) 03:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
I seem to be in a funny mood today so just passing by to say thank you for your contributions. -Tavas (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


I have deleted one of your uploads because it contained CP. CP images are not allowed on this wiki. Please crop it out if you are going to upload again. --ST13 (talk) 04:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Good edits

Good edits, I enjoy reading your content. However, some pages are very biased and unprofessional, see the pages for Childs Play and to a lesser extent The Promised Land. Would you mind editing them to be more objective?

Thanks, Singularity- (talk) 02:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

I would like to add

I can't seem to add or edit the paid services section, are you able to do it for me?? just wanted to add a new one

Sure what do you want to add? LoveCP (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

fucking stupid infobox

Maybe Shah should not make Jokes like that & give good reasons for me to give warnings like that I Used to be a Global Moderator at Magic Kingdom and was nearly made Head Mod but I left I would love it if Shah did not do any of the things which have led so many to not trust him I would love it if Magic Kingdom did not get compromised, But I do not believe it is a "fucking stupid infobox" or that it is reason for me to be Demoted, If you have an issue with any of my edits you are welcome to contact me about them BugMeNot666 (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes BMN was an original mod at MK like me, then disappeared without a trace for several months so was removed, and funnily enough now pops up as a mod of every MK clone thereafter. Speaking of which did you ever sign a message from your original key after your little sabbatical? Singularity- (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
I was only removed from Mod After I returned but not to MK. Hardly anybody knows that I even had a key at that time, I hardly used it and never intended to use it to verify my identity, only to allow people to encrypt things they wanted to send me, But as I never used it and then took a long break I did forget the password to it, That was so long ago and so little knew about the key anyway that literally no one but it seems Trolls really care that I changed keys, I got my new key because I needed it as Mod of ChildsPlay not even because I wanted it, I would rather Not say anything I need to hide from LEA, Shah has changed key Multiple Times & Gave they Key Publicly to everyone to Authenticate them, it is quite different to my original key, Especially since it has not just happened once with Shah BugMeNot666 (talk) 03:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Shah changed keys once, not multiple times. And you were removed because you disappeared, no one knew where you were, only for you to reappear as soon as CP opened, which is kind of odd. Singularity- (talk) 01:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Are you sure about that because I am fairly sure they changed Key when switching to The Promised Land and tried to hide he was the Same Admin, Then he changed Key Again Without any Notice, Warning or Explanation when he Gave up On The promised Land and brought back MK, I also did not Appear as soon as CP Opened, I was around much before it, Just not advertising myself anywhere so you probably did not see me, Of course you assume that is odd BugMeNot666 (talk) 23:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Here is a Quote from ChildsPlay on the Subject
[quote='DoctorBlasik' pid='105872' dateline='1484026931']
[quote='Ella' pid='105839' dateline='1484021338']
[quote='imaima' pid='105766' dateline='1484009011']
that "slogan" is a bit accurate actually.

It's not at all. was the URL of Magic Kingdom since the fall of 2015. This URL change is the first one in over a year.

The URL was changed in 2016 and was signed with shahs old key. Now the new URL is changed again and key is signed with new key(he posts on a topic saying welcome back with his newkey). I would be cautious about using that place things don't add up like why shah deleted his pgp key topic around july 2016 after editing the topic with his new key and wasnt signed with his old key.

Then TPL gets launched, closes. Then MK comes back and shah signs with his new key. The problem isn't that he changed his key it's that he didnt sign his new pgp block with his old key and is trying to be very sneaky about it

What's funny is a lot of people don't notice this so it's obvious not many people care about security. For example a user called OutOfWorld posted this the post can be found here

[quote='OutOfWorld pid='100451' dateline='1482967402']

[This isn't the original key Shah has. This is from the new public key block which shah tried to change on MK this year july 2016.

The original key is actually posted here by nogger. [img][/img]

The thread he refers to is now (is now deleted. This topic originally had shahs original key). Shah changed and edited the topic to his new key block around July without signing a message from his old key and some people noticed the key was changed so he deleted the topic


That's the original key finger print and key ID


And above is the new key ID created 2016 july. This just means that who ever the original shah is doesnt have access to his original key for reasons unknown to us. Deleting his original public key block topic without giving reason is suspicious as well. Cant even find access to his new public key block as well. Pretty certain he tried to edit the new key on his old key topic but deleted because people were noticing.

Here's a topic of a message signed with shah using his old key

Hash: SHA512

Registrations were briefly closed to implement an invite code system to slow the rate of new registrations (we were close to 1800/day). The invite code is currently apple sauce. It is not hard to find.

Users also now have the ability to delete their account manually. To do this, navigate to User Control Panel > Profile > Delete my registration. This will permanently delete your account and all posts from the database.

Version: GnuPG v1


It looks as though something is happening and even if Shah isn't compromized he could atleast tell us why he is using a new key. The people who are not following security are being manipulated by shah since the message is signed but only by a new key which wasnt signed by his old key.  The thread deletions of his key is suspicious as well since OutOfWorld states the thread was edited with his new public key block and then someone noticed and thread is now deleted.

Basically him signing messages on his new key doesn't mean anything until he signs a message using his old key stating he is going to be using this new key
I do believe my warnings have been Fair "Shah has never posted a PGP signed message on a regular basis. The staff there seem to think this is ok even though they criticize any other sites Admin for being a day late posting theirs." BugMeNot666 (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
I will add a topic in the actual article about the April Fools prank because I do believe historically-speaking that is is relevant. But all evidence as of now points to a prank, and not that the site is compromised. At TGE, when we had exact evidence to conclude a site hack, warnings were posted everywhere. We have no evidence of this at this time, therefore it is inappropriate to put a warning message like that. Also, Magic Kingdom as far as I know has never used a canary to verify themselves - occasionally a PGP signed message here and there, but no canary. Childs Play does - so when a canary is late, it is worth noting. However this comment doesn't even apply to MK. It was a The Promised Land admin that made a comment about the lateness of a Childs Play canary - not an MK staff. And although it is quite likely that Ella is CP13, I have yet to see him admit it outright himself, so I cannot add a note about that in the article until indisputable proof is provided. Thanks for your time. LoveCP (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)